FocusAnswer
Do app badges actually increase phone pickups?
Red notification badges are built to pull you back in. Here's what the research says about whether hiding them helps.
The short answer
App badges are a deliberate behavioural-design feature intended to prolong app usage, and they work by creating a pull to check. The direct evidence that hiding badges reduces pickups is limited, but the mechanism behind them is well documented, and removing them is a low-cost, plausible intervention.
The evidence
- 1 RCT
- 1 observational study
- 1 review
Key takeaways
- App badges are one of several design elements built to extend time in apps, not to serve you.
- The psychological pull of badges is well documented, but direct trials on hiding them are scarce.
- A ten-day intervention using self-monitoring and mindfulness reduced smartphone distraction in students, though not habitual checking.
- Hiding badges is a cheap, reversible change worth testing on yourself.
- Social support changes how smartphone use affects emotional health, so context matters more than any single toggle.
In this piece, 5 sections
Why app badges exist
App badges are not a neutral design choice. A red circle with a number is engineered to trigger a response. In a 2019 narrative review of addictive features in social media apps and freemium games, researchers identified six mechanisms that app designers use to prolong usage, and linked them to established psychological principles such as the mere-exposure effect, the endowment effect and the Zeigarnik effect1.
The Zeigarnik effect is the relevant one here: unfinished tasks occupy more mental space than completed ones. A badge that says "3" is an unfinished task. It signals that something is waiting for you, and the brain tends to want to close that loop. The review concludes that these elements can prolong usage time, though it also notes that isolating the effect of any single element is difficult because independent scientists rarely get access to app-level data1.
What actually drives phone checking
The honest answer is that we do not have a large, controlled trial showing that hiding badge icons alone reduces phone pickups. What we have is strong evidence that apps are designed to pull you in, and weaker but suggestive evidence that reducing those pulls helps.
A ten-day randomised controlled trial with 143 UK university students tested an online intervention combining mindfulness exercises, self-monitoring and mood tracking. The intervention produced large reductions in self-reported smartphone distraction and improved several secondary psychological outcomes. However, it did not reduce habitual behaviours, nomophobia, or time spent on social media2.
That distinction matters. Distraction is the feeling of being pulled away from what you intended to do. Habitual checking is the automatic reach for the phone. Badges feed both, but they are not the whole story. The trial's mediation analysis found that emotional self-awareness, not mindful attention, explained much of the improvement in distraction2. In other words, noticing why you reach for the phone may matter more than any single interface tweak.
Does hiding badges work in practice?
Given the absence of a direct trial, the strongest case for hiding badges is mechanistic. If badges create a pull to check, removing them removes one pull. That is not a guarantee, but it is a reasonable, testable hypothesis.
The review by Montag and colleagues supports the idea that design elements like badges are part of a business model built on attention extraction. They argue that it may be better to regulate or remove certain design elements than to expect users to resist them through willpower alone1. Hiding badges is a user-level version of that removal.
From the Unleashed Environment Bank: "Badge counts hidden on home screen: Red badge icons are designed to trigger a check. Removing them can cut down on phone pickups." This is a practical recommendation, not a research finding, but it aligns with the mechanism described in the literature.
The context problem
One study of 360 college students in mainland China tracked smartphone usage for a week using an automatic tracking app, then measured emotional health and perceived social support. Among students with high perceived social support, more frequent and longer social networking app use was associated with better emotional health3.
This is an observational study, so it cannot establish causation. But it complicates the simple story that phone checking is always bad. The same behaviour can have different effects depending on why you are doing it and who is on the other end. A badge from a close friend's message is not the same as a badge from a shopping app.
The practical implication: you do not need to eliminate all badges. You need to decide which apps deserve the right to interrupt you.
What to do this week
Start with the cheapest possible experiment. On iPhone, go to Settings, then Notifications, and turn off "Badges" for every app except messaging apps where a missed message has real consequences. On Android, long-press the app icon and disable notification dots.
Then observe for a week. You are not measuring screen time in the abstract. You are measuring how often you pick up the phone without a clear intention. If the number drops, keep the change. If it does not, the badges were not your main trigger, and you can look elsewhere: home screen layout, notification sounds, or the habit of reaching for the phone during boredom.
From the Unleashed Awareness Bank: "Phone checking: Reaching for your phone within seconds of boredom — a tiny habit cue that hijacks attention." If boredom is the trigger, no badge setting will fix it. You need a replacement behaviour, not just a removal.
For a deeper reset, pair badge removal with a 90-minute deep work block with no phone and no notifications, from the Unleashed Moves Bank, or a low-dopamine morning that delays phone use for 90 minutes after waking. These are complementary strategies, not substitutes.
If you want a structured way to track these changes, Unleashed OS includes habits, a journal, mood check-ins, reminders and curated banks of research-backed moves. It is in public beta on iOS via TestFlight.
The evidence does not let us say "hiding badges reduces pickups by X per cent." But it does let us say this: badges are designed to pull you in, the pull is real, and removing it costs you nothing. That is a good enough reason to try.
Questions, answered
Are app badges designed to be addictive?
Yes. A 2019 review identified badges and similar design elements as mechanisms intended to prolong app usage, linked to psychological principles like the Zeigarnik effect, where unfinished tasks create a pull to complete them1.
Is there a study proving that hiding badges reduces phone pickups?
Not directly. A ten-day RCT reduced smartphone distraction using mindfulness, self-monitoring and mood tracking, but it did not reduce habitual checking or social media time, and it did not isolate badges as a variable2.
Does phone checking always harm wellbeing?
No. An observational study of 360 students found that among those with high perceived social support, more social networking app use was associated with better emotional health, suggesting context and purpose matter3.
What is the Zeigarnik effect?
It is the tendency to remember and feel pulled toward unfinished tasks more than completed ones. App badges exploit this by presenting a number that signals something is waiting for you1.
Should I hide badges on all apps?
Not necessarily. Consider keeping badges on messaging apps where a missed message has real consequences, and hiding them on apps that exist to capture attention, such as shopping, news and social media.
How long should I test badge removal before deciding if it works?
A week is a reasonable trial. Track how often you pick up your phone without a clear intention. If pickups drop, keep the change. If not, the trigger is likely elsewhere, such as boredom or notification sounds.
References
The Research Library- 01
Montag C, Lachmann B, Herrlich M et al. (2019). Addictive Features of Social Media/Messenger Platforms and Freemium Games against the Background of Psychological and Economic Theories. International journal of environmental research and public health.
- 02
Throuvala MA, Griffiths MD, Rennoldson M et al. (2020). Mind over Matter: Testing the Efficacy of an Online Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Distraction from Smartphone Use. International journal of environmental research and public health.
- 03
Liu Y, Yi H (2022). Social networking smartphone applications and emotional health among college students: The moderating role of social support. Science progress.
Unleashed Newsroom
The newsletter
New pieces from the newsroom, in your inbox, with every claim still linked to its source.
Educational content, not medical advice. It can't account for your circumstances; talk to a qualified professional about your own health. Researched with AI assistance and reviewed by a human editor before publication. Read our standards. Spotted an error? Write to hello@unleashed.vision.